Serial Processing Vs Parallel Processing

Serial Processing Vs Parallel Processing Rating: 7,6/10 5494 votes

It's easy for me to just conceal my front plate when I want to take pictures or wash the vehicle. It's gone through many hand washes and time on the highway, still sturdy. No complaints. Install license plate holder.

  1. Serial Processing Vs Parallel Processing Form

This brings us to the crux of our argument: serial processing and parallel processing systems can be thought of as organizational analogs to the types of decisionmaking defined earlier--that is, the constructivist and the ecological approaches. Tests of parallel vs. Serial processing, possibly due, to some extent, to the ability ofparallel and serial models to mimic one another in the common experimental paradigms. Nevertheless, the issue has refused to fade away. The case may be put forth that how subtasks are worked on is an integral. Serial vs parallel processing In serial processing, same tasks are completed at the same time but in parallel processing completion time may vary. In sequential processing, the load is high on single core processor and processor heats up quickly. Serial vs parallel processing In serial processing, same tasks are completed at the same time but in parallel processing completion time may vary. In sequential processing, the load is high on single core processor and processor heats up quickly.

Serial Processing Vs Parallel Processing Form

  1. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., &Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model.Psychological Science,5, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, F. G., Tein, J.-Y., &Balakrishnan, J. D. (1993). Response time distributions in memory scanning.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,37, 526–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1980). Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,21, 93–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C., Herrman, D. J., &Westcourt, K. T. (1974). Search processes in recognition memory. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 101–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R. C., Holmgren, J. E., &Juola, J. F. (1969). Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chelazzi, L. (1999). Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A critical look at the evidence.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,62, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colonius, H., &Vorberg, D. (1994). Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,38, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick, R. B., &Hochhaus, L. (1975). Memory search as a function of phonological context.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,5, 256–258.Google Scholar
  9. Egeth, H., &Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays.Cognitive Psychology,3, 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data.Psychological Bulletin,53, 134–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forrin, B., &Cunningham, K. (1973). Recognition time and serial position of probed item in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huesmann, L. R., &Woocher, F. D. (1976). Probe similarity and recognition of set membership: A parallel-processing serial-featurematching model.Cognitive Psychology,8, 124–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luck, J. S. (1994). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of visual search.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,4, 183–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McElree, B., &Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1971). A parallel-processing model for scanning.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen, G. D., &Smith, E. E. (1973). Imaginal and verbal representations in short-term recognition of visual forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 375–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,24, 574–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rahman, R. A., & Sommer, W. (2002).Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  20. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberts, S., &Sternberg, S. (1993). The meaning of additive reactiontime effects: Tests of three alternatives. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 611–653). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor methods analysis of a Stroop task.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,26, 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schweickert, R., &Giorgini, M. (1999). Response time distributions: Some simple effects of factors selectively influencing mental processes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schweickert, R., &Townsend, J. T. (1989). A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 328–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snodgrass, J. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1980). Comparing parallel and serial models: Theory and implementation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.Science,153, 652–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 1–32.Google Scholar
  30. Swanson, J. M., &Briggs, G. E. (1969). Information processing as a function of speed versus accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Townsend, J. T. (1969).Mock parallel and serial models and experimental detection of these. Paper presented at the Purdue Centennial Symposium on Information Processing.Google Scholar
  32. Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133–168): Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished.Psychological Science,1, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1983).The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Townsend, J. T., &Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,39, 321–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Townsend, J. T., &Schweickert, R. (1985). Interactive effects of factors prolonging processes in latent mental networks. In G. d’Ydewalle (Ed.),Cognition, information processing, and motivation: XXIII International Congress of Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 255–276). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Townsend, J. T., &Thomas, R. D. (1994). Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: Effects on systems factorial interactions.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,38, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Zandt, T., &Townsend, J. T. (1993). Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenger, M. J., &Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 229–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar